Daniel Duarte
These ratings blend a limited performance sample with a historical peer baseline and remain provisional.
About these ratings
Tool ratings combine recorded performance with statistical estimates. Speed, arm, and fielding include outcome-based estimates rather than direct physical measurements.
Limited MLB evidence: 28.9% MLB and 71.0% level-adjusted minor-league estimate.
Minor-league estimate: 26.2% observed statistical weight and 73.8% historical peer baseline; individual tools use their own sample weights.
* On NTV, this indicates estimated or unverified inputs. CE uses an asterisk only when current contract information is unavailable.
CE uses the best available contract information, including partial terms, estimated salaries, and projected team control. CE shows an asterisk only when current contract information is unavailable; free agents without a current agreement use 100*.
2026 win contribution
1.34 Player Wins · 0.62 expected from replacement · 0.72 wins above replacement
Includes contributions to every team played for in 2026. Perf expresses wins above replacement on a scale where 100 is average. How the win totals reconcile
Six-tool graphs show percentiles from available performance evidence. Speed uses baserunning outcomes; Arm uses position-adjusted throwing outcomes. Movement describes tracked pitch movement within pitch type. Minor-league comparisons account for competition level; unavailable measurements display MD.
Edge Profile
Edge combines Perf, Stick, and Carry to show how valuable a player is right now. With a Perf of 95, Stick of 106, and Carry of 101, Daniel Duarte sits in the 71st percentile, 78th percentile, and 75th percentile in those areas. His 97 Edge lands in the 73rd percentile and ranks 105th among relief pitchers.
Stick Profile
Stick looks beyond the immediate results and estimates what should hold over a larger sample. Daniel Duarte's 106 Stick suggests he is performing below what his underlying profile supports. It also places him in the 78th percentile and ranks 148th among relief pitchers.
Perf Profile
Perf measures season wins above replacement after allocating each team's actual wins to its players. It includes Daniel Duarte's contributions to every team he played for. His 95 Perf is around average on a scale where 100 is average and 20 points is one standard deviation. It sits in the 71st percentile and ranks 104th among relief pitchers.
Carry Profile
Carry places Perf in the context of the roster around a player and includes a bounded clutch adjustment for offense, pitching, and defense when available. Close games and later innings earn more weight, and difficult defensive plays receive their own credit. His clutch runs are offense +0.0, pitching +2.2, defense -0.2. The strongest rated teammates are Nolan McLean at 130, Juan Soto at 126, and A.J. Ewing at 112. Daniel Duarte has contributed about as much as his own Perf suggests, resulting in a Carry of 101.
LI Profile
LI looks at how much useful baseball a player may still have ahead of him. At age 29, Daniel Duarte carries a 99 LI, which points to a steady near-term outlook without a major longevity advantage. That places him in the 10th percentile and ranks 2387th among relief pitchers.
CE Profile
CE compares expected production with the money and years attached to a contract. The model uses a 2 seasons control horizon, $0.8 million average annual value, and about $0.8 million in contract-scenario costs for Daniel Duarte. Options and arbitration can make those years or costs conditional; manual contract inputs may lag new agreements. His 106 CE leans in the club's favor, placing him in the 66th percentile and 966th among relief pitchers.
NTV Profile
NTV estimates Daniel Duarte's value on a neutral trade market before the needs of a specific club are considered. His +8* NTV reflects his present ability, expected future value, age, contract, control, positional demand, and risk. That mark sits in the 58th percentile and ranks 969th among relief pitchers. Daniel Duarte has modest positive value, though the market return would depend heavily on fit and demand.